Decision Operating System v3.0

40% of pipeline time is wasted on poor-fit prospects.

Every revenue team has AI.
Nobody has a Decision OS.

Know why before you act — every time.

Stop guessing. Start deciding with evidence.

Start FreeView Plans
5-agent debateDecision Graph
ARGUS Sidebar
Live
Verdict94% conf
STRONG YES
Weighted: ICP(40%) + Intent(35%) + Risk(15%) + Research(10%)
ICP Match: 5/5 criteria
Series B, 87 employees, VP Engineering
Intent Signal: Hiring 3 SREs
Scaling pain confirmed (Apollo)
Risk: No previous engagement
Cold outreach required
Hi Sarah — saw your recent post on scaling K8s. We helped [Similar Company] reduce infra costs by 40% during their Series B growth phase. Would you be open to a brief exchange on how you're approaching this?
The Five Graphs

Every decision is a node.
Every node is a lesson.

Evidence Graph

Captures all raw and derived signals about a prospect — firmographic, technographic, intent, and historical.

Decision Graph

The core asset — structured, auditable decisions with explicit reasoning chains and confidence scores.

Action Graph

Links decisions to concrete actions — real drafted messages, ready to send.

Outcome Graph

Ground truth that closes the learning loop — replies, meetings, opportunities, and closed revenue.

Learning Graph

Meta-layer that extracts patterns and improves future decisions based on historical outcomes.

The Verdict Spectrum

Not just scores.
Verdicts with reasoning.

STRONG YES
90-100
High ICP fit + strong intent + low risk. Message immediately.
YES
70-89
Good fit with manageable risk. Proceed with standard outreach.
WAIT
50-69
Potential fit but insufficient signal. Monitor for intent changes.
PASS
30-49
Poor fit or high risk. Do not invest time unless signal changes.
HARD PASS
0-29
Clear misalignment. Avoid to protect pipeline hygiene.
Company Memory

Your organization becomes smarter.
Not the AI.

Every decision your team makes becomes permanent institutional intelligence. New hires start with the wisdom of your best veterans. Departures don't erase judgment.

PATTERNS (last 30 days)Live
Series B SaaS with 50-150 employees
→ STRONG YES accuracy: 78% (12 decisions)
→ Avg time to meeting: 4.2 days
→ Best message tone: Bold, specific metric
Fortune 500, new title < 6 months
→ PASS accuracy: 91% (9 decisions)
→ Reason: Long procurement cycles, low close rate
RISK FLAGS (auto-generated)Active
Director title + >1000 employees
23% meeting rate vs. 45% team average
Recommendation: Require additional intent signal
No tech stack overlap + Series A
Close rate: 4% vs. 22% baseline
Recommendation: Auto-PASS unless strong intent
243
Decisions
84%
Accuracy
12
Patterns
Get Started

Begin with evidence.

Plans that scale with your team — from a free first look to full enterprise control.

Free
$0
1 seat · 50 decisions/mo
Full verdict & evidence, message drafts, Company Memory, Slack integration
Start Free
Starter
$49/mo
3 seats · 500 decisions/mo
Everything in Free, higher usage limits
Start Starter
Pro
$149/mo
10 seats · 2,500 decisions/mo
Everything in Starter, team analytics
Start Pro
Enterprise
$499/mo
Unlimited seats · 10,000 decisions/mo
Everything in Pro, priority support
Start Enterprise